Rated 3.3 out of 5 by 3
Rated 4 out of 5 by TSHA Great casual/dressy pant
In June I bought the Bowery slim seersucker pants to wear to a wedding, and I found them to be both well-made and comfortable. They look great--slim without being too skinny and tight in the leg.
So I bit the bullet and bought two pairs of the slim Bowery stretch chino in the two shades of blue. True to its name, the "stretch" name does hold true--it gives just that extra bit of room for seating and driving comfortably. The pants wear like a very casual pant, but have the look and style of a dressy pant.
I'd give them 5 STARS, but the nearly $80 is really steep for non-wool slacks.
I bought a 36/30 in these--my size. Because of the stretch, I could ALMOST go to a 35, but they are quite comfortable as is.
July 27, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by Hadi Comfortable Work Pants
I have really bought into the Bowery Slim Stretch line. I currently own the forest green, ravine blue, and the vintage grey options. I will purchase more when more colors are available. There is a complaint noting that these run very large. I am typically a 33 or 34 waist (more so 33) and purchased the 33's. These pants give a bit; however, not significantly more than any other pants I own from the Bowery line. The legs have a nice taper and offer a lot of mobility. One slight grievance I have with this line is that the tab closure has the potential to crease so if you do not have a tapered waist, if not, ensure to wear a belt to complete your ensemble. The only other complaint I have is that the thighs can potentially pill depending how much your thighs touch. Overall, a must have. The colors are beautiful.
September 14, 2016
Rated 2 out of 5 by Chicago Waist two inches two large
Ordered this in a 32x30. When it arrived, I was swimming in it and using a measuring tape discovered it was actually 34". Tag and everything says 32" so not sure whether this is a defect or whether J. Crew pants always run large (first time here).
Because of that, hard to judge the style since everything was so loose. Quality seemed fine.
Will update after receiving new size.
August 5, 2016