770 Bedford cord cabin pant
full size
770 Bedford cord cabin pant
770 Bedford cord cabin pant
770 Bedford cord cabin pant
Product Details

The cords for the guy who's looking for a slim fit that's actually easy to move (and sit) in. This narrow-wale cord is even tougher than your favorite denim and has an unexpected flannel lining for added warmth and a rugged look.

  • Cotton.
  • Zip fly.
  • Traditional 5-pocket styling.
  • Flannel lined.
  • Machine wash.
  • Import.
Size & Fit Details
  • Straight through hip, with a slim thigh and leg.
  • 15" leg opening (based on size 32/32).

770 Bedford cord cabin pant

770 Bedford cord cabin pant is rated 4.3 out of 5 by 12.
Rated 5 out of 5 by from Bedford Cord Flannel Lined Cabin Pant My son likes these pants. He says they are comfortable and likes the softness of the flannel lining and the extra warmth it will provide in the cold winter weather about to come our way. If offered, I would also purchase a softer, true corduroy. Overall, we are both very pleased with the purchase. Great pant. Thank you!
Date published: 2015-12-07
Rated 4 out of 5 by from Runs Small I usually wear a 34 waist and have many pairs of JC pants in a 34 but these are more like a 33 waist. I measured them against other JC jeans and they are definitely smaller by about 1" to 1.5". Other than that I love them, it remains to be seen if I can ever squeeze into them for longer than a few minutes at a time, hoping they will stretch because I really, really like them otherwise!
Date published: 2016-02-18
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Problem with Fit I hope J Crew Development team can read this. This pants is warm and love the design. however, fit is very uncomfortable. Pants Back panels are too narrow around High Hip compared to the front. Also, Back Crotch length /Saddle is a little short which you feel when you sit. In comparison, Front Crotch length might be a little too long. Because Back leg panels are too narrow, you feel tight & pulled around Hip when you walk & sit. I'm quite slim around Hip & Waist and usually wear 28/32 for most. I tried both 28/32 & 29/32 and problem is consistent on both. Overall, Back High-Hip needs about 1/2" in width. Then, Take out from Front panels by 3/8" in order to balance. Waist measurement however, coming out slightly loose. I'm keeping 29/32 although it is too big at waist. I have to wear belt. This problem is true to all of 770 styles.
Date published: 2016-12-03
Rated 3 out of 5 by from Fits very tight I really liked these, the length was good, but they were extremely tight. I own a couple 32/30 broken-in urban slim chinos but can squeeze into a 31/30 pair that I also own. Got these in 32/30 and I could hardly button the front. My 31/30 broken-in pair fits better than these do in 32/30.
Date published: 2016-01-13
Rated 2 out of 5 by from Fits incredibly small Great quality/style. I'm tall and slim and I ordered a 32 rather than a 30 and I can barley get these pants up my legs let alone my butt. Really disappointed because these are really sharp pants.
Date published: 2016-10-28
  • y_2017, m_1, d_18, h_17
  • bvseo_bulk, prod_bvrr, vn_bulk_0.0
  • cp_1, bvpage1
  • co_hasreviews, tv_0, tr_12
  • loc_en_US, sid_E4173, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=HELPFULNESS, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=RATING, direction=DESCENDING), SortEntry(order=AGE, direction=DESCENDING)]
  • clientName_jcrew