Rated 4.1 out of 5 by 9
Rated 1 out of 5 by Elizabeth Serged hem? Seriously?
So, the bottoms of the ruffles are serged...the hallmark of incredibly cheap clothing. Really, J. Crew? Have we fallen this far? There is literally nowhere to shop for work anymore...I wish the ruffles were smooth at the edge--it's otherwise a very cute dress.
August 5, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by Amethyst Lovely
This dress is sexy and sophistocated. It has a beautiful silhouette when worn. I love the ruffle detail, it adds the right amount of fun to an otherwise classic style.
August 10, 2016
Rated 5 out of 5 by Irene great style/fit
I loved this dress, feels great and so flattering. I'm 5'5"ish 125 and got a 2. The length is my preferred length (just below knee cap)can't say anything bad about it and I certainly wouldn't say the serged hem is cheap looking at all.
August 10, 2016
Rated 4 out of 5 by SnazzieB So Close...Yet So Far Away for Me
I was really excited about this dress and the color which I have not seen from J. Crew in a while. However, I felt that it ran a touch small, and that was the only reason why I returned. For my curvy figure, it pulled a bit across the hips. But I will say that the ruffles are such a fun detail. While I did not feel that the serged ruffles cheapened the dress, I can understand what the other writer meant by wishing it were not serged.
I did not feel the violet was as vibrant as I expected, and I would probably have been happier with the charcoal or black. The length however was spot on for my 5'4'' height.
August 19, 2016
Rated 3 out of 5 by AnnieofNorthernVA Not Impressed
I ordered this dress despite the negative reviews because I own a number of the Super 120S Wool dresses and have had no problems with them. I liked the ruffles around the bottom and because the Super 120S Wool is usually a nice material. The wool this dress is made from is nothing like the wool in my previous purchases of Super 120S Wool, this dress is made from very thin and cheap material.
I was shocked at the quality of this wool. I don't mind paying for quality, however this is not a high quality item. I received it today, and returned it today.
August 24, 2016