Vintage cord in 770 fit
full size
Vintage cord in 770 fit
Vintage cord in 770 fit
Vintage cord in 770 fit
Product Details

Our cords are now available in our 770 fit: more narrow than our 1040 slim-straight, not as skinny as the 484 (our slimmest fit). The sulphur-dye and vintage-wash process is all ours. We gave them an authentic jean look and feel with hand sanding on the thighs, knees and seat and additional grinding along the waistband, pockets and hem.

  • Cotton.
  • Zip fly.
  • Traditional 5-pocket styling with reinforced back pockets.
  • Machine wash.
  • Import.
Size & Fit Details
  • Sits below waist.
  • Straight through hip, with a slim thigh and leg.
  • 15 1/4" leg opening (based off size 32/32).
Rated 4.1 out of 5 by 18 reviewers.
Rated 5 out of 5 by Wonderfully fitting cord! I purchased this item because I was looking for another type of pant that would be similar in fit to the Urban Slim chinos that I love so much. A J.Crew sales associate recommended that I look into the 770 fit, and boy, am I glad that I did! These cords fit beautifully, in a style very similar to the Urban Slim—not too loose, and not too tight. And while the fit was for me the most important aspect of the pant, I am pleased to say that I also found the quality of construction and dye to be exceptional as well. Overall, I am very pleased with this purchase and would gladly recommend it to anyone looking to find that perfect pair of cords. May 14, 2014
Rated 5 out of 5 by Great fit These pants fit great and seem to run true to size unlike the 770 jeans. Please make the sloppy 770 jeans fit like these!!! August 29, 2014
Rated 4 out of 5 by 770 for skinny people I had already owned denim in the 770 fit. They were a great fit, slim not skinny. Great for thin people without much hips or rear end to hold up pants. When I saw the 770 fit in cords I decided to try them out. The fit is the same. Great addition to the wardrobe. December 5, 2014
Rated 4 out of 5 by love these I got my first pair last year and loved them so much that I got two far...this year. September 9, 2014
Rated 3 out of 5 by They are okay, about average. Better than many, nice, but not that special. Priced about right. I wear them a lot so that is good. October 22, 2014
  • 2015-04-25T16:51:48.176-05:00
  • bvseo_lps, prod_bvrr, vn_prr_5.6
  • cp-1, bvpage1
  • co-hasreviews, tv_18, tr_18
  • loc_en_US, sid_07530, prod, sort_default
1 of 2