Rating & Reviews
Fits big based on
6 customer reviewsWhat customers are saying:
Customers liked the crisp light-wash denim and the overall fabric feel, and a few said the jeans felt comfortable once they found the right size. Many noted that this pair runs larger and looser than expected for a 484 slim fit, especially through the legs and openings, so some customers suggested sizing down. A few reviews also pointed out that the cut can feel less tapered than classic 484s. Overall, the jeans seem to have a nice look and solid denim, but the fit and consistency are a bit all over the place.
Generated from the text of customer reviews.
Filter Reviews 1 - 3 of 6 Reviews
Dave
Age: 35 to 44Body type: Straight and slenderHeight: 5'11"Size Purchased: 32/30Fits big
Sizing guide for a perfect fit
July 31, 2019I’m 5’11 slim build. A true 33/32. These run large and long. I purchase a 32/30. Didn’t want a rolled up cuff. PERFECT FIT! Took advantage of the huge discount and finally have the Japanese denim jeans I always wanted.
Helpful?Charles
Age: 25 to 34Body type: Straight and slenderHeight: 5'9"Size Purchased: 30/30Fits big
Best J.Crew denim in years... still needs work.
May 16, 2019Background: I'm still wearing a pair of Canadian-made selvedge J.Crew 'vintage slim' jeans from 2007. They're virtually indestructible look better with each passing year. Since 2010 I've also been wearing various Chinese-made 484s -- especially the Japanese selvedge model (now discontinued) which were decent if a far cry from both the Canadian denim of yore and Wallace and Barnes Cone stuff. Last few years J.Crew started adding synthetic fibers that wrecks the durability and feel of the fabric. Now FINALLY I saw these 'rigid' (meaning normal denim) jeans. Verdict? Crisp fabric. Really nice light wash - clean light blue. Good fit through body (similar if not better than prior 484s which were always a little too low in the rise). Other reviews are right about leg openings being a tad wider than standard 484s. Main gripe is that the distressing is too aggressive on the pockets, fly, and leg openings. These things are going to start falling apart at those points earlier than they should.
Helpful?portsmouthguy
Age: 45 to 54Body type: AthleticHeight: 5'7"Size Purchased: 32x34Fits big
Cut way off...
May 9, 2019Been wearing 32x34 484 jeans for years...bought 2 pair of these last week and the sizing any styling is very loose...not even close to what the 484 cut has traditionally been. I’m returning 1 pair...unfortunately I washed the other thinking they needed to shrink...no such luck. Avoid these if you’re looking for the slim low rise 484 cut...not even close! The Japanese denim is a great fabric though...
Helpful?